Friday, October 8, 2010

The Ananias in Acts 5 vs the Ananias in Acts 9

Note: This post was first published on ROOTSS on Thursday, 8 February 2007

One of the stories in the book of Acts that used to put fear in my heart was the account of Ananias and Sapphira as recorded in Acts 5. Here we read of a couple who died tragically because they kept part of the proceeds from the sale of their property for themselves, but made it appear as though it was the entire amount.

I have also heard several sermons where this passage is quoted to reinforce that believers need to fear the LORD, because He will punish us like He did that couple.

Acts 5 Ananias and Sapphira
1Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property. 2With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the money for himself, but brought the rest and put it at the apostles' feet.
3Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land?
4Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to men but to God."
5When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened.
6Then the young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried him out and buried him.
7About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened.
8Peter asked her, "Tell me, is this the price you and Ananias got for the land?" "Yes," she said, "that is the price."
9Peter said to her, "How could you agree to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look! The feet of the men who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also."
10At that moment she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her beside her husband.
11Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events.

But if one were to read that passage carefully, there is actually no mentioned anywhere that it was God or the Holy Spirit that struck them dead. This is an assumption that many of us have probably adopted because we were led to believe that God is a God of "no nonsense" and will not hesitate to punish us!

But that is not the point... yet...

There is another Ananias that Luke tell us about in Acts 9:10. He was the "middleman" that God asked to minister to the apostle Paul just after the latter had his road to Damascus experience.

Acts 9
10In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, "Ananias" "Yes, Lord," he answered.
11The Lord told him, "Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying.
12In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight."
13"Lord," Ananias answered, "I have heard many reports about this man and all the harm he has done to your saints in Jerusalem.
14And he has come here with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who call on your name."
15But the Lord said to Ananias, "Go! This man is my chosen instrument to carry my name before the Gentiles and their kings and before the people of Israel.
16I will show him how much he must suffer for my name."
17Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, "Brother Saul, the Lord—Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here—has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit."
18Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul's eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptized,
19and after taking some food, he regained his strength.

So what is the point, you may ask? The point is that the Ananais in Acts 5 was being described as a "man" (aner, Strong's G435), whereas this Ananais in Acts 9 was referred to as a "disciple" (mathetes, Strong's G3101)!

There are no insignificant details in the Bible. Everything is there for a purpose, because "all" Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching and equipping us (2 Tim 3:16-17).

The book of Acts was written by Luke to Theophilus. Luke was both a medical doctor as well as an historian with an eye for careful detail. The Holy Spirit saw fit to inspire him to use different terms to distinguish those who were believers from those who were not; believers were referred to as disciples, while non-believers were referred to as men.

Throughout the book of Acts, he maintains a consistent distinction between a person who was a believer, and one who is not, viz:

Acts 5:1 [Ananias and Sapphira]
Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property.

Acts 6:1 [The Choosing of the Seven]
In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Grecian Jews among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food.

Acts 7:58
dragged him out of the city and began to stone him. Meanwhile, the witnesses laid their clothes at the feet of a young man named Saul. (Note: Saul/Paul was not a believer at this time yet until after his road to Damascus experience in Acts 9)

Acts 8:30
Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet. "Do you understand what you are reading?" Philip asked. (Note: the Ethiopian eunuch was not a believer at this time yet until Philip explained the Scriptures to him, and he accepted Christ as recorded in Acts 8:37)


Acts 9:10
In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, "Ananias!" "Yes, Lord," he answered.

Acts 9:33
There he found a man named Aeneas, a paralytic who had been bedridden for eight years.

Acts 9:36
In Joppa there was a disciple named Tabitha (which, when translated, is Dorcas ), who was always doing good and helping the poor.

Acts 10:1 [Cornelius Calls for Peter]
At Caesarea there was a man named Cornelius, a centurion in what was known as the Italian Regiment. (Cornelius was not a believer until Peter preached to him, after which he received the baptism of the Holy Spirit and water baptism as recorded in Acts 10:44-48)

Acts 14:8 [In Lystra and Derbe]
In Lystra there sat a man crippled in his feet, who was lame from birth and had never walked.

Acts 16:1 [Timothy Joins Paul and Silas]
He came to Derbe and then to Lystra, where a disciple named Timothy lived, whose mother was a Jewess and a believer, but whose father was a Greek.

Acts 16:9
During the night Paul had a vision of a man of Macedonia standing and begging him, "Come over to Macedonia and help us."

Acts 19:16
Then the man who had the evil spirit jumped on them and overpowered them all. He gave them such a beating that they ran out of the house naked and bleeding.

So there you have it: the story of the 2 Ananias (and others). The Ananias in Acts 5 was a non-believer who had reason to fear God. The Ananias in Acts 9 was a believer who had no reason to fear God. Today, we who are disciples of Jesus Christ need not be fearful of God.

As Paul says in Rom 8:15, we "did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, "Abba, Father."

Isn't Daddy God a good God? Thank you, Daddy God!

Afternote: In his sermon on 28 Oct 2010, Ps Prince clarifies 2 occasions when the word "man" was used to describe disciples: Acts 18:7 and Acts 25:14.

Acts 18:7
Then he left there and went to the house of a man named Titius Justus,a worshiper of God, whose house was next to the synagogue. (NASB)

The word "man" is in italics, indicating that it was not in the original Greek text.


You can verify this here
http://interlinearbible.org/acts/18-7.htm


And that is why the NIV version omits the word "man" totally, viz: 
Then Paul left the synagogue and went next door to the house of Titius Justus, a worshiper of God.

Acts 25:14
Since they were spending many days there, Festus discussed Paul’s case with the king. He said: “There is a man here whom Felix left as a prisoner."

Narrative vs Quotation


Note that Paul is being described as "a man" by Festus. It is a quotation. Being an unbeliever himself, he would not have referred to Paul as "a disciple". Contrast this with other parts in the book of Acts whereby the pasages are being narrated by Luke and Luke is very careful to describe believers as disciples.

14 comments:

  1. "Afternote: In his sermon on 28 Oct 2010, Ps Prince clarifies 2 occasions when the word "man" was used to describe disciples: Acts 18:7 and Acts 25:14."

    Is this message available? Or is this meant to be 28 November 2010, which is the date for the extract entitled 'The truth about Ananias and Sapphira'? That extract doesn't contain the above clarification, but it would make sense if it was in the same sermon.

    Would be grateful if you could point me to the source for your postcript in red. Thanks,

    Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found the mp3 for the entire sermon, and it is there - 28 November 2010.

    The word ἀνὴρ is frequently used for believers: see Acts 6:3,5 (the 7, Stephen), Acts 11:20, Acts 11:24 (Barnabas), Acts 15:22,25 (Judas and Silas), Acts 22:12 (Ananias of Damascus).

    Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  3. It also states that he died in acts 5.... the men wound him up brought him outside and buried him... along with sapphira...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its not a powerful basis that the term man consider to be unbeliever. We dont interpret the bible that way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It has been cleared my mind about these two the same names. Praise God and thank you. God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love this and has clearify many thing that seems confusing about the death of the couples.

    ReplyDelete
  7. But i want know to different between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not sure I agree with this assessment about Ananias in Acts 5. Your premise is that he was not a believe. If that is the case, why would he even sell his property and give any of it to the Apostles? Acts 5:3 - ...why have you lied to the Holy Spirit, Acts 5:4 - ...You have not lied to man but to God, Acts 5:5 he fell down and breathed his last. If it wasn't God or the Holy Spirit who killed him, who did? It certainly wasn't Peter. IMHO, the church was really young at this point and God needed to keep integrity of truth paramount at the beginning to keep the church pure. Therefore he was not going to tolerate lying. By the way, if Peter knew about the lie, couldn't non-believers? Thereby destroying the witness of the early church before it even got going? There is no indication that Peter found out by the Holy Spirit. Incidentally, it doesn't indicate that Ananias and Sapphira were dammed, only that they dropped dead for their deed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smiles...

      Your points are clear and we'll understood by an open mind. I appreciate your contributions.

      Please note that the approach to the interpretation of the distinctive descriptive differentiation of persons the writer is using is "Original contextual meaning"

      To add to your already explained points and inferences drawn.
      As you have stated "IMHO, the church was really young at this point..."
      This indicates that Ananias of Act 5 was a member of the early church (young church).

      Isaiah 29:13, Matthew 15:8 and Matthew 7:21.The unfaithful act of Ananias as revealed to Peter is a prove that he (Ananias) was only a proffessor of the Lord with his mouth but his heart was far away from the truth.

      Matthew 16:18-23 is a case of the same man (Peter) who God used against Ananias, how he was addressed as Satan even after the revelation of the Father came through him (just few verses before his rebuke).

      Further confirmed by Ezekiel in chapter 18 verse 24 of his book.
      Even if he was a disciple, but at that very point, he had departed from the righteousness of God and the reward was what he received from the address even to his death.

      The above Bible passages proves beyond doubt why Ananias would not have been referred to as a disciple.

      Therefore as regards the writers point of view that the Ananias of Act 5 and Act 9 has the distinction of an unbeliever and a disciple respectively is accurately correct.

      Also, the death of Ananias of Act 5 was not of Paul but of God through the Holy Spirit.

      See:
      The question in Ezekiel 18:24 "...shall he live?" Is answered in 33:18 of the same Ezekiel.

      I said "...of God by the Holy Spirit" because at the time, it was the role of the Holy Spirit which Jesus sent to the earth to supersede over the elect of God. See John 15:26, Luke 24:49 and Act 2:1-4.

      Therefore the writer (although not stated clearly in the preceding verses of Act 5 how and whom caused their death) is wrong implying that Ananias and Sapphira were not killed of God nor the Holy Spirit because other Bible passages have made clear the judgement of such act committed by the couple.

      Delete
    2. Wow..that'such an informative and insightful article in layman speak..

      Delete
  9. Yes nice findings, but my current revelations agree with the “unknown” poster on October 1 2019. Also Acts 22:12 calls the prophet Ananias a “devout man”.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Smiles...

    Your points are clear and we'll understood by an open mind. I appreciate your contributions.

    To add to your already explained points and inferences drawn.

    Ananias of Act 5 was a member of the early church (young church).

    Isaiah 29:13, Matthew 15:8 and Matthew 7:21.The unfaithful act of Ananias as revealed to Peter is a prove that he (Ananias) was only a proffessor of the Lord with his mouth but his heart was far away from the truth.

    Matthew 16:18-23 is a case of the same man (Peter) who God used against Ananias, how he was addressed as Satan even after the revelation of the Father came through him (just few verses before his rebuke).

    Further confirmed by Ezekiel in chapter 18 verse 24 of his book.
    Even if he was a disciple, but at that very point, he had departed from the righteousness of God and the reward was what he received from the address even to his death.

    The above Bible passages proves beyond doubt why Ananias would not have been referred to as a disciple.

    Therefore as regards the point of view that the Ananias of Act 5 and Act 9 has the distinction of an unbeliever and a disciple respectively is accurately correct.

    Also, the death of Ananias of Act 5 was not of Paul but of God through the Holy Spirit.

    See:
    The question in Ezekiel 18:24 "...shall he live?" Is answered in 33:18 of the same Ezekiel.

    I said "...of God by the Holy Spirit" because at the time, it was the role of the Holy Spirit which Jesus sent to the earth to supersede over the elect of God. See John 15:26, Luke 24:49 and Act 2:1-4.

    Therefore the writer (although not stated clearly in the preceding verses of Act 5 how and whom caused their death) is wrong implying that Ananias and Sapphira were not killed of God nor the Holy Spirit because other Bible passages have made clear the judgement of such act committed by the couple.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Three things.
    1. Who killed the two?
    2. Are we to fear God?
    3. Are "men" always a reference to unbelievers?

    I don't think Satan killed the two. He would have been proud of their sin and tried to use them instead. I don't think it was Peter (unless his words, empowered by the Holy Spirit, causing a heart attack). It does say it caused great fear among those who heard these things.

    I believe the revelation of a great and mighty God caused such great fear in them that they died. Peter naturally assumed his wife would have the same revelation. But, I can also believe that the Holy Spirit could have killed them and revealed to Peter that He would do the same to Sapphira. This was after all the beginning of the church. I'm sure witnessing people speaking in tongues would have curled some hairs as well.

    I agree as believers, we are no longer under God's judgment (although I wouldn't test that by practicing sin Gal 5:19). But, scripture does tell us to fear (reverence) a Holy God. This article seems to be heading toward justifying the eternal security argument. I believe that argument is gaining popularity today because the church wants to live a lukewarm doctrine. To which Jesus replies He will spit you out of his mouth.

    Yes, He is my father and my God. I loved my father and never doubted his love for me. He was a great and accomplished man but, I also feared him. After witnessing the boatload of fish, Peter fell at Jesus' feet and said go away from me I am a sinful man. The others felt the same. Jesus hadn't threatened them.

    Our natural response before a great and mighty God would first be fear. John fell as dead, before Him. When the disciples heard God's voice on the mount of transfiguration the fell on their faces and were "sore afraid".


    Those who carried Ananias and Sapphira away were referred to as "men", not disciples or believers. If I was not a believer I certainly wouldn't help carry away two dead people. Instead, I would have run!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. Work out your own salvation with fear n trembling..pretty much my experience..

      Delete